New Jersey Institute For The Advancement of Truth

Link List of Law Firms

1. American Center For Law and Justice (ACLJ). Jay Alan Sekulow is Chief Counsel for the ACLJ and Chief Counsel for the European Center for Law and Justice (ECLJ) and is considered one of your top Constitutional law attorneys in the United States. Recommended booklet from the ACLJ for high school students: Students' Rights and the Public Schools.  (It should be noted that an advisor for a Bible Club cannot control the club--in other words, the Equal Access Act prohibits faculty or staff from serving in any role with religious student groups other than as a custodial monitor. The Bible Club does not need the advisors' permission to sponsor speakers or conduct the club the way they want to.)
2. Foundation For Moral Law--Judge Roy Moore.
3. Thomas More Law Center
4. Alliance Defense Fund (ADF)
5. Rutherford Institute
6. Advocates For Faith & Freedom
7. Canada Family Action Cialition
8. The Becket Fund--for religious liberty.
9. Pacific Justice Institute
10. Judicial Watch—they expose & sue corrupt government officials.
11. How to Win a Lawsuit Without Hiring a Lawyer by David C. Grossack
12. Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE)
13. Students for Academic Freedom
14. Handling Police Encounters—what should students do?
15. Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR - Psychiatry (an Industry of Death)—legal options if one has been a victim.
16. Parental Rights
17. Second Amendment Attorneys and Foundations
18. Federation fo Airsoft Standards and Training
19. Handling Police Encounters —recommended for teenagers.
20. Police Abuse
21. Sheriff Mack of Arizona—how to eliminate police harassment & the high cost of Township Police Departments (see Homeland Security & Police/Sportsmen site for more information on this subject).
22. Evan F. Nappen (Attorney At Law for Firearms issues in New Jersey
23. Armed Citizens’ Legal Defense Network, LLC—Network members’ attorneys can request case review by a Network self-defense expert at no charge.
24. Homeschool Legal Advantage—protecting the rights of homeschoolers.
25. Fully Informed Jury Association—see their media catalog.
26. Handbook for Juries
27. Caught.net—jurors’ Handbook
28. Christian Anti-Defamation Commission (CADC)—General William Slater Hollis, a retired U.S. Army Brigadier General, Ranger, Paratrooper and decorated Korean War Veteran, started CADC in 1999 to protect Christians from defamation, discrimination, bigotry and so on.
29. Carl M. Ippolito—Attorney At Law, JD/MBA—located at 1 Washington Crossing Road, Pennington, NJ 08534 [Hunterdon County resident]; Ph# 609-818-1222 or 609-818-1170; E-Mail: cmippolito@hotmail.com (An honest attorney specializing in Business Contracts, Business Formation, Business Planning, Business Litigation, Corporation, LLCs, Partnerships, Corporate Law, Estate Planning, Wills & Trusts, Discrimination suites, Personal Injuries, etc.)
30. American Firearms Munitions & Consulting—expert witness service to the legal professional in an ample variety of firearms (an attorney & former Federal Agent).
31. US Legal Forms—recommended by G. Gordon Liddy
32. Street Light Ministries 1st Amendment rights were violated over the years; as a result, the ministry fought for their rights and were aided by the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) and the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ). Cases won in favor of the ministry for denying them access to evangelize and distribute tracts: City of Rehoboth Beach, DE and Seaside Heights, NJ.
    (Click PDF file on the Supreme Court of New Jersey’s decision on whether regional shopping malls should permit distribution of leaflets.)
    http://www.streetlightinfo.com/

Restraining Orders Out of Control

When the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 sponsored by Senator Joseph Biden (D-Del.) and Senator Barbara Box (D-Calif.) and was signed into law by President Clinton, it took a bad system and made it worse.  The act provided federal money to foment more dissension between the sexes and funnels money to certain favored programs.  It also instructs local police to make more arrests and coordinates interstate enforcement of abuse-protection orders. The act is highly discriminatory and gives financial, political, legal advantage to women in the family court.  There have been several versions of the act passed in intervening years.  (Supporting the Biblical definition of a family and its obligations and duties of a husband and wife is far more effective in preventing violence against women.)

A listing of major problems with the Violence Against Women Act of 1994:

• An applicant can get a domestic-abuse restraining order for almost any reason.
• Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR) issued a report that stated that it is as easy to get a restraining order as a fishing or hunting license—RADAR states: “The law defines almost any interpersonal maladjustment as ‘domestic violence,’ the courts then establish procedures to expedite the issuance of these orders.”
• Many women use the restraining order option for ulterior motives, such as to get custody of children without a court hearing, quick eviction hearing, added advantage in divorce and revenge.
• There are no rules of evidence, burden of proof, cross examination, no jury when an applicant files a restraining-order—the woman can come to court secretly and just state she feels fearful. One woman even filed a complaint for against her husband for kicking a plastic cooler while leaving the house after he found that she was having an adulterous relationship—she filed a total of 14 false criminal complaints about violations of the order.
• There were 4,796 emergency protective-orders petitions issued in West Virginia in 2006; an estimated 80.6 percent “are false or unnecessary” and cost the state $18,200,000 according to professor of accountancy Benjamin P. Foster, Ph.D, CPA, CMA.
• Women commit abuse more than men and this is confirmed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There report states: “In non-reciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70 percent of the cases. Reciprocity was associated with more frequent violence among women, but not men.”
• Restraining orders violate and interfere with Second Amendment rights. The state’s laws require that a defendant surrender all guns and ammunition (it is not only a state crime, but a federal one under this act).  Many law enforcement officers and military police had to take a desk job because their wives’ got a restraining order against them and thus lost their right to carry a weapon—this is a disgrace.
• Restraining Orders Out of Control

The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 and all subsequent acts should be immediately repealed.  Many of the liberal politicians and (many conservative politicians pressured by the feminists) in both parties are responsible for the passage of this highly discriminatory and family destroying act.  Please lobby your Congressmen and Senators to repeal these laws.